Continuing the Stolen Generations: Child Protection Interventions and Indigenous People
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Socio-legal study of child protection interventions and Indigenous families; the object is child welfare, not research.
The article studies Indigenous child-protection interventions and legal processes.
Legal/social analysis of Indigenous child-protection removals, not the research system.
Abstract
Indigenous Australian children are significantly over-represented in out of home care. Figures evidencing this over-representation continue to increase at a startling rate. Similar experiences have been identified among native peoples in Canada, the United States and New Zealand.Drawing on interviews with lawyers who work with Indigenous parents in child protection matters in Queensland, Australia, this article examines how historical factors, discriminatory approaches and legal structures and processes contribute to the high rates of removal and, we argue, to the perpetuation of the stolen generations.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
The record
- Venue
- SSRN Electronic Journal
- Topic
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Child protectionIndigenousPsychological interventionCriminologyPolitical scienceLawPsychologyMedicineNursing
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes