Multilevel Approaches for the Critical Node Problem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multilevel programming can provide the right mathematical formulations for modeling sequential decision-making problems. In such cases, it is implicit that each level anticipates the optimal reaction of the subsequent ones. Defender–attacker–defender trilevel programs are a particular case of interest that encompasses a fortification strategy, followed by an attack, and a consequent recovery defensive strategy. In “Multilevel Approaches for the Critical Node Problem,” Baggio, Carvalho, Lodi, and Tramontani study a combinatorial sequential game between a defender and an attacker that takes place in a network. The authors propose an exact algorithmic framework. This work highlights the significant improvements that the defender can achieve by taking the three-stage game into account instead of considering fortification and recovery as isolated. Simultaneously, the paper contributes to advancing the methodologies for solving trilevel programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it