Using deep LSD to build operators in GANs latent space with meaning in real space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generative models rely on the idea that data can be represented in terms of latent variables which are uncorrelated by definition. Lack of correlation among the latent variable support is important because it suggests that the latent-space manifold is simpler to understand and manipulate than the real-space representation. Many types of generative model are used in deep learning, e.g., variational autoencoders (VAEs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs). Based on the idea that the latent space behaves like a vector space Radford et al. (2015), we ask whether we can expand the latent space representation of our data elements in terms of an orthonormal basis set. Here we propose a method to build a set of linearly independent vectors in the latent space of a trained GAN, which we call quasi-eigenvectors. These quasi-eigenvectors have two key properties: i) They span the latent space, ii) A set of these quasi-eigenvectors map to each of the labeled features one-to-one. We show that in the case of the MNIST image data set, while the number of dimensions in latent space is large by design, 98% of the data in real space map to a sub-domain of latent space of dimensionality equal to the number of labels. We then show how the quasi-eigenvectors can be used for Latent Spectral Decomposition (LSD). We apply LSD to denoise MNIST images. Finally, using the quasi-eigenvectors, we construct rotation matrices in latent space which map to feature transformations in real space. Overall, from quasi-eigenvectors we gain insight regarding the latent space topology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".