Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data-dependent memory accesses (DDAs) pose an important challenge for high-performance graph analytics (GA). This is because such memory accesses do not exhibit enough temporal and spatial locality resulting in low cache performance. Prior efforts that focused on improving the performance of DDAs for GA are not applicable across various GA frameworks. This is because (1) they only focus on one particular graph representation, and (2) they require workload changes to communicate specific information to the hardware for their effective operation. In this work, we propose a hardware-only solution to improving the performance of DDAs for GA across multiple GA frameworks. We present a hardware prefetcher for GA called Gretch, that addresses the above limitations. An important observation we make is that identifying certain DDAs without hardware-software communication is sensitive to the instruction scheduling. A key contribution of this work is a hardware mechanism that activates Gretch to identify DDAs when using either in-order or out-of-order instruction scheduling. Our evaluation shows that Gretch provides an average speedup of 38% over no prefetching, 25% over conventional stride prefetcher, and outperforms prior DDAs prefetchers by 22% with only 1% increase in power consumption when executed on different GA workloads and frameworks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".