Multi-objective robust-stochastic optimisation of relief goods distribution under uncertainty: a real-life case study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a multi-objective robust-stochastic humanitarian logistics model to assist disaster management officials in making optimal pre- and post-disaster decisions. This model identifies the location of temporary facilities, determines the amount of commodity to be pre-positioned, and provides a detailed schedule for the distribution of commodities and the dispatch of vehicles. Uncertainties in demand, node reachability by a particular mode of transportation, and condition of pre-positioned supplies after a disaster are considered. Another supposition of this paper is the equity in the distribution of commodities. This paper contributes to the existing literature by adding vehicle flow and multi-periodicity into a robust-stochastic optimisation model. A real-life case study of a flood in Bangladesh shows the applicability of our model. Finally, the findings show that the proposed model can aid decision-makers in allocating resources optimally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it