Efficient Decomposition of Bayesian Networks With Non-graded Variables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elicitation, estimation and exact inference in Bayesian Networks (BNs) are often difficult because the dimension of each Conditional Probability Table (CPT) grows exponentially with the increase in the number of parent variables. The Noisy-MAX decomposition has been proposed to break down a large CPT into several smaller CPTs exploiting the assumption of causal independence, i.e., absence of causal interaction among parent variables. In this way, the number of conditional probabilities to be elicited or estimated and the computational burden of the joint tree algorithm for exact inference are reduced. Unfortunately, the Noisy-MAX decomposition is suited to graded variables only, i.e., ordinal variables with the lowest state as reference, but real-world applications of BNs may also involve a number of non-graded variables, like the ones with reference state in the middle of the sample space (double-graded variables) and with two or more unordered non-reference states (multi-valued nominal variables). In this paper, we propose the causal independence decomposition, which includes the Noisy-MAX and two generalizations suited to double-graded and multi-valued nominal variables. While the general definition of BN implicitly assumes the presence of all the possible causal interactions, our proposal is based on causal independence, and causal interaction is a feature that can be added upon need. The impact of our proposal is investigated on a published BN for the diagnosis of acute cardiopulmonary diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".