The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Misconceptions about ADHD stigmatize affected people, reduce credibility of providers, and prevent/delay treatment. To challenge misconceptions, we curated findings with strong evidence base. METHODS: We reviewed studies with more than 2000 participants or meta-analyses from five or more studies or 2000 or more participants. We excluded meta-analyses that did not assess publication bias, except for meta-analyses of prevalence. For network meta-analyses we required comparison adjusted funnel plots. We excluded treatment studies with waiting-list or treatment as usual controls. From this literature, we extracted evidence-based assertions about the disorder. RESULTS: We generated 208 empirically supported statements about ADHD. The status of the included statements as empirically supported is approved by 80 authors from 27 countries and 6 continents. The contents of the manuscript are endorsed by 366 people who have read this document and agree with its contents. CONCLUSIONS: Many findings in ADHD are supported by meta-analysis. These allow for firm statements about the nature, course, outcome causes, and treatments for disorders that are useful for reducing misconceptions and stigma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Topic
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- University of British ColumbiaCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoToronto Dementia Research AllianceCanadian Arthritis Patient AllianceMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Mental HealthMedical Research CouncilNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBrandeis UniversityAction Medical ResearchLundbeckfondenWellcome Trust
- Keywords
- Statement (logic)PsychologyPsychiatryConsensus conferenceRussian federationPolitical scienceMedicineRegional scienceGeographyLawInternal medicine
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes