Learning Enabled Adaptive Multiple Attribute-based Physical Layer Authentication
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose an adaptive multi-attributes based physical layer authentication framework for enhanced authenticity provisioning. Instead of optimizing the "threshold" for a preset PHY-layer signature, this paper resort to exploiting and selecting multiple historical better performed PHY-layer attributes for authentication enhancement. In particular, the authenticator of the proposed scheme is designed to be capable of recording the historically performance of each potential attribute. Based on which, the most effective PHY-layer attributes (MEA) would be chosen to improve the reliability of the PHY-layer authentication. This paper experimentally proves that the dimension extension on PHY-layer signature attributes effectively enhances authenticator's capability in signal discrimination. However, with more attribute to observe, it also complicates the predicting and authenticating procedure. Therefore, a learning-based search algorithm is then formulated to facilitate the MEA selection procedure. Both theoretical analysis and experiment results are given to demonstrate the efficiency and superiority of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it