Detection and Prediction of Diabetes Using Data Mining: A Comprehensive Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diabetes is one of the most rapidly growing chronic diseases, which has affected millions of people around the globe. Its diagnosis, prediction, proper cure, and management are crucial. Data mining based forecasting techniques for data analysis of diabetes can help in the early detection and prediction of the disease and the related critical events such as hypo/hyperglycemia. Numerous techniques have been developed in this domain for diabetes detection, prediction, and classification. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art in the area of diabetes diagnosis and prediction using data mining. The aim of this paper is twofold; firstly, we explore and investigate the data mining based diagnosis and prediction solutions in the field of glycemic control for diabetes. Secondly, in the light of this investigation, we provide a comprehensive classification and comparison of the techniques that have been frequently used for diagnosis and prediction of diabetes based on important key metrics. Moreover, we highlight the challenges and future research directions in this area that can be considered in order to develop optimized solutions for diabetes detection and prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it