MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3130335793 · doi:10.1109/ojpel.2021.3052541

Current and Potential Applications of Additive Manufacturing for Power Electronics

2021· article· en· W3130335793 on OpenAlexafffund
Luis Lopera, Romina Rodriguez, Mostafa Yakout, Mo Elbestawi, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)ElectronicsPower electronicsComponent (thermodynamics)Electronic componentManufacturing engineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)Electronic equipmentSystems engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To meet the upcoming challenges of higher power density and higher efficiency for power electronics, a system level approach to the design of power electronic devices must be carried out. Higher system integration and packaging will allow for more compact designs but will also result in challenges for component manufacturing and thermal management. Additive manufacturing can potentially mitigate some of these challenges due to the design flexibility and intricate features that additive manufacturing methods can provide. This paper presents an overview of the additive manufacturing technologies currently in practice at the academic and industry level. A detailed review is presented of current applications of additive methods for the production of power electronic components, advanced heat exchanger designs and integrated power electronic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of Power ElectronicsSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207