Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Similarity Range Query Over Encrypted Time Series Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Similarity query over time series data plays a significant role in various applications, such as signal processing, speech recognition, and disease diagnosis. Meanwhile, driven by the reliable and flexible cloud services, encrypted time series data are often outsourced to the cloud, and as a result, the similarity query over encrypted time series data has recently attracted considerable attention. Nevertheless, existing solutions still have issues in supporting similarity queries over time series data with different lengths, query accuracy and query efficiency. To address these issues, in this article, we propose a new efficient and privacy-preserving similarity range query scheme, where the time warp edit distance (TWED) is used as the similarity metric. Specifically, we first organize time series data into a$k$d-tree by leveraging TWED’s triangle inequality, and design an efficient similarity range query algorithm for the$k$d-tree. Second, based on a symmetric homomorphic encryption technique, we carefully devise a suite of privacy-preserving protocols to provide a security guarantee for$k$d-tree based similarity range queries. After that, by using the similarity range query algorithm and these protocols, we propose our privacy-preserving similarity range query scheme, in which we elaborate on two strategies to make our scheme resist against the cloud inference attack. Finally, we analyze the security of our scheme and conduct extensive experiments to evaluate its performance, and the results indicate that our proposed scheme is indeed privacy-preserving and efficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".