MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3133764116 · doi:10.1088/1361-6544/ac72e8

Critical sharp front for doubly nonlinear degenerate diffusion equations with time delay

2022· article· en· W3133764116 on OpenAlexafffund
Tianyuan Xu, Shanming Ji, Ming Mei, Jingxue Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinearity · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsChamplain Regional CollegeMcGill University
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is concerned with the critical sharp travelling wave for doubly nonlinear diffusion equation with time delay, where the doubly nonlinear degenerate diffusion is defined by ( ( u m ) x p − 2 ( u m ) x ) x with m > 0 and p > 1. The doubly nonlinear diffusion equation is proved to admit a unique sharp type travelling wave for the degenerate case m(p − 1) > 1, the so-called slow-diffusion case. This sharp travelling wave associated with the minimal wave speed c*(m, p, r) is monotonically increasing, where the minimal wave speed satisfies c*(m, p, r) < c*(m, p, 0) for any time delay r > 0. The sharp front is C 1-smooth for 1 p − 1 < m < p p − 1 , and piecewise smooth for m ⩾ p p − 1 . Our results indicate that time delay slows down the minimal travelling wave speed for the doubly nonlinear degenerate diffusion equations. The approach adopted for proof is the phase transform method combining the variational method. The main technical issue for the proof is to overcome the obstacle caused by the doubly nonlinear degenerate diffusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNonlinearitySame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207