Trajectory Design and Access Control for Air–Ground Coordinated Communications System With Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned-aerial-vehicle (UAV)-assisted communications has attracted increasing attention recently. This article investigates air–ground coordinated communications system, in which trajectories of air UAV base stations (UAV-BSs) and access control of ground users (GUs) are jointly optimized. We formulated this optimization problem as a mixed cooperative–competitive game, where each GU competes for the limited resources of UAV-BSs to maximize its own throughput by accessing a suitable UAV-BS, and UAV-BSs cooperate with each other and design their trajectories to maximize the definedfair throughputto improve the total throughput and keep the GU fairness. Moreover, the action space of GUs is discrete, while that of UAV-BS is continuous. To tackle this hybrid action space issue, we transform the discrete actions into continuous action probabilities and propose a multiagent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL) approach, named air–ground probabilistic multiagent deep deterministic policy gradient (AG-PMADDPG). With well-designed rewards, AG-PMADDPG can coordinate two types of agents, UAV-BSs and GUs, to achieve their own objectives based on local observations. Simulation results demonstrate that AG-PMADDPG can outperform the benchmark algorithms in terms of throughput and fairness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".