MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134124199 · doi:10.17975/sfj-2020-013

Fate of Crude Oil in the Environment and Remediation of Oil Spills

2020· article· en· W3134124199 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSTEM Fellowship Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceOil spillEnvironmental remediationOil refineryCrude oilPipeline transportPetroleumPetroleum industryBiodegradationShoreWaste managementPollutionOil pollutionEnvironmental engineeringPetroleum engineeringContaminationEngineeringOceanographyGeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The world consumes approximately 5.1 billion tons of crude oil per year, with the United States and Saudi Arabia producing the largest shares [1]. Countries rely on various means for transporting crude oil [1, 2]. Large vessel/tankers transport oil at sea, while oil is transported inland via pipelines, railroads, trucks, and barges [2]. Unfortunately, some of the oil gets spilled into the ocean, freshwater bodies, and terrestrial ecosystems during its production, transportation, and use [3]. Usually, oil spills are caused by accidents involving tankers, barges, pipelines, refineries, drilling rigs, and storage facilities [3]. Small spills are frequent, but are handled by local responders. However, in the case of relatively large spills, known as spills of national significance, a national effort is needed to respond. Examples of large spills include the running aground of the Exxon Valdez in Alaska and the Deepwater Horizon blowout in the Gulf of Mexico. These spills triggered the application of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and ensuing regulations [4-9]. When an oil spill reaches the shoreline, efforts are taken to remove as much of the oil as possible using physical means, such as water flushing [3]. When the oil content within sediments becomes too low, physical removal becomes inefficient and/or can lead to further damage [3]. In this situation, oil biodegradation, that is the degradation of oil mediated by microorganisms, becomes an important process to consider [10]. Beaches are bioremediated by monitoring and enhancing the biodegradation of oil. Critically understanding and analyzing oil biodegradation and remediation techniques allows for a better response by decision-makers. This paper first addresses the general chemical composition of oils and then covers the different physical and natural processes that can remove crude oil from beaches, with a focus on bioremediation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it