MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134785390 · doi:10.4995/caa.2021.15086

Espacios de imágenes del anime: Walter Benjamin y las políticas del consumo

2021· article· es· W3134785390 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCon A de animación · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicWalter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimeHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Este artículo analiza los estudios del anime contemporáneo y cómo se cruzan con el pensamiento político del filósofo y crítico Walter Benjamin (1892-1940). A través de un examen de los escritos de Benjamin sobre arte y política, junto con la teoría crítica de la producción y el consumo de anime, este ensayo destaca los potenciales políticos radicales de la creación de imágenes de anime para el público. Revisando las prácticas específicas de producción, distribución y consumo de anime, y la teoría contemporánea que las rodea, se argumentará que los escritos de Benjamin sobre la política del arte pueden ayudarnos a apreciar mejor estas prácticas y sus ramificaciones políticas. Estos rasgos aludidos incluyen la composición de imágenes planos, la mezcla de medios de anime, inmovilidad en la animación limitada, y prácticas de consumo otaku. Este ensayo termina con ejemplos de la franquicia más grande de Neon Genesis Evangelion para mostrar el pensamiento político de Benjamin en acción.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it