MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136326573 · doi:10.7202/1075507ar

Quels rôles joue l’aide-enseignant en contexte inclusif ? Constats et enjeux

2021· article· fr· W3136326573 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfance en difficulté · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Saint-BonifaceUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente des résultats d’une métasynthèse qui avait comme principal objectif de produire de nouvelles connaissances sur l’opérationnalisation et les conditions de mise en oeuvre de pratiques plus inclusives au primaire et au secondaire. Outre les résultats quant aux apports et aux limites des pratiques qui tendent vers l’inclusion, au rôle central que joue la collaboration au sein du projet inclusif et à l’importance du leadership de la direction d’école à cet égard, nombre de textes analysés mettent en évidence le rôle tantôt clairement défini tantôt intuitif de l’aide-enseignant. Cet article vise à expliciter les apports et les limites du rôle de l’aide-enseignant en contexte inclusif, et ce, en ce qui concerne tant son rapport aux élèves qu’il accompagne que son rapport aux enseignants qu’il soutient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it