MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136368678 · doi:10.6339/jds.201407_12(3).0007

Copulas Applications in Estimating Value-at-Risk (VaR): Iranian Crude Oil Prices

2021· article· en· W3136368678 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Data Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCopula (linguistics)EconomicsEconometricsCrude oilNormalityRisk managementPetroleumValue at riskProfit (economics)Multivariate statisticsFinancial economicsFinanceStatisticsMicroeconomicsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crude oil being the primary source of energy is been unquestioningly the main driving engine of every country in this world whether it is the oil producer economy and/or oil consumer economy. Crude oil, one of the key strategic products in the global market, may influence the economy of the exporting and importing countries. Iran is one of the major crude oil exporting partners of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Analysis of the risk measures associated with the Iranian oil price data is of strategic importance to the Iranian government and policy makers in particular for the short-and long-term planning for setting up the oil production targets. Oil price risk-management focuses mainly on when and how an organization can best prevent the costly exposure to the price risk. Value-at-Risk (VaR) is the commonly accepted instrument of risk-measure and is evaluated by analysing the negative tail of the probability distributions of the returns/profit and loss. Among several approaches for calculating VaR, the most common approaches are variance-covariance approach, historical simulation and Monte-Carlo simulation. Recently, copula functions have emerged as a powerful tool to model and simulate multivariate probability distributions. Copula applications have been noted predominantly in the areas of finance, actuary, economics and health and clinical studies. In addition, copulas are useful devices to deal with the non normality and non-linearity issues which are frequently observed in cases of financial time series data. In this paper we shall apply copulas namely; Frank copula, Clayton copula and Gumbel copula to analyse the time series crude oil price data of Iran in respect of OPEC prices. Data considered are; i. Monthly average prices for a barrel of Iranian and OPEC crude oil, from January 1997 to December 2008, ii. Seasonal number of barrels of Iran’s crude oil export, from January 1997 to December 2008. The results will demonstrate copula simulated data are providing higher and lower relative change values on the upper and lower tails respectively in comparison to the original data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it