Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern shared-memory platforms embrace the Non-uniform Memory Access (NUMA) architecture - they have physically distributed, yet cache-coherent shared-memory. This paper explores the feasibility of a shared-memory graph processing engine for NUMA platforms inspired by designs that target zero-sharing platforms. This work exploits the characteristics of two processing modes, synchronous and asynchronous, in the context of the shared-memory NUMA platform. Depending on the algorithm, phase of execution, and graph topology, synchronous and asynchronous modes hold unique advantages over one another. We then explore a hybrid solution that combines synchronous and asynchronous processing within the same graph computation task and harness optimizations therein. An extensive evaluation using graphs with billions of edges and empirical comparisons with several state-of-the-art solutions demonstrate the performance advantages of our design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it