MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3138115700 · doi:10.1049/iet-ipr.2020.0709

Multimodal action recognition using variational‐based Beta‐Liouville hidden Markov models

2020· article· en· W3138115700 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Image Processing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHidden Markov modelBETA (programming language)Action (physics)Artificial intelligenceMarkov chainComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsMarkov processMachine learningPhysicsStatisticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The visible spectrum is the most widely used modality for video media. Nonetheless, it is highly dependent on the lighting conditions. Hence, infrared (IR) imaging lower light sensitivity characterisation presents the untapped potential for robust automatic recognition systems. This is applicable to many applications including IR action recognition (AR), which is a relatively young field in IR. As such, in this study, the authors tackle IR and multimodal AR with the proposed utilisation of variational learning of Beta‐Liouville (BL) hidden Markov models (HMMs). Furthermore, to the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first evaluation of the BL HMM in visible AR and in multimodal fusion for AR. They present the results of the proposed model on the infrared action recognition and the IOSB datasets. Experimental results demonstrate promising outcomes. The importance of using IR and multispectral fusion in AR is also highlighted by the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it