DOC-SLAM: Robust Stereo SLAM with Dynamic Object Culling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To improve the accuracy of estimating camera trajectory in dynamic scenes, this paper proposes Dynamic Object Culling SLAM(DOC-SLAM), a stereo SLAM system that achieves good performance by culling actual moving objects in highly dynamic environments. DOC-SLAM combines the semantic information from panoptic segmentation with the point features from optical flow together to detect potential moving objects. And a moving consistency check module is designed to determine and remove the feature points in objects which are in motion so as to accomplish dynamic objects culling. Besides, for enhancing the robustness of our system, we devise a key point supplement strategy to provide sufficient and reliable key points for tracking. Meanwhile, the trajectory and landmarks are generated for localization and mapping of robots. The experimental evaluation on public datasets demonstrates that our DOC-SLAM can fit highly dynamic scenes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it