MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3139089294 · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.207886

Robotic grasping in unstructured and dynamic environments

2021· dissertation· en· W3139089294 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQueensland University of Technology · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research CouncilAustralian Centre for Robotic VisionAmazon RoboticsAustralian GovernmentCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsClutterArtificial intelligenceViewpointsRoboticsComputer scienceComputer visionState (computer science)RobotHuman–computer interactionRadarAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grasping and transporting objects is a fundamental trait that underpins many robotics applications, but existing works in this area are not robust to real-world challenges such as moving objects, human interaction, clutter and occlusion. In this thesis, we combine state-of-the-art computer vision techniques with real-time robotic control to overcome these limitations. We present a number of algorithms that can compute grasps for new items in a fraction of a second, react to dynamic changes in the environment, and intelligently choose improved viewpoints of occluded objects in clutter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it