On efficient Monte Carlo-based Statistical Static Timing Analysis of digital circuits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Monte-Carlo (MC) technique is a well-known solution for statistical analysis. In contrast to probabilistic (non-Monte Carlo) statistical static timing analysis (SSTA) techniques, which are typically derived from simple statistical or timing models, the MC-based SSTA technique encompasses complicated timing and process variation models. However, a precise analysis that involves a traditional MC-based technique requires many timing simulation runs (1000s). In this paper, the behavior of the critical delay of digital circuits is investigated by using a Legendre polynomial-based ANOVA decomposition. The analysis verifies that the variance of the critical delay is mainly due to the pairwise interactions among the principal components (PCs) of the process parameters. Based on this fact, recent progress on the MC-based SSTA, through Latin hypercube sampling (LHS), is also studied. It is shown that this technique is prone to inefficient critical delay variance and quantile estimating. Inspired by the decomposition observations, an efficient algorithm is proposed which produces optimally low L2-discrepancy quasi-MC (QMC) samples which significantly improve the precision of critical delay statistical estimations, compared with that of the MC, LHS, and traditional QMC techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".