MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3141654846 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2006.328617

Application of Segmented 2D Probabilistic Occupancy Maps for Mobile Robot Sensing and Navigation

2006· article· en· W3141654846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - IEEE Instrumentation/Measurement Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccupancy grid mappingOccupancyMobile robotProbabilistic logicArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionSegmentationMobile robot navigationRobotRepresentation (politics)Sensor fusionRobot controlEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concepts of occupancy grids and probabilistic maps were introduced at the end of the eighties. Since then, research work focused mainly on the definition of the representation, data fusion and generation of occupancy models. Few consideration has been given to processing occupancy maps as textured images in order to extract meaningful information required for robot navigation and control of interactions with the environment. This paper investigates the application of segmentation techniques on probabilistic occupancy maps represented as textured images. Enhancements are proposed to a uniformity estimation technique based on local binary pattern and contrast (LBP/C) to achieve robust segmentation of occupancy maps that typically result from range sensors with limited resolution. The accuracy of the segmented 2D occupancy maps is demonstrated experimentally through an application on mobile robot navigation with collision avoidance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it