MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142482680 · doi:10.1177/1541931213601199

This Changes Everything

2016· article· en· W3142482680 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicErgonomics and Human Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeUnrestCapitalismEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceNatural resourcePosition (finance)Public relationsPolitical economySociologyEngineering ethicsBusinessLawEcologyPoliticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Naomi Klein in her recent book ‘ This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate’ (Klein, 2014) argues that climate change represents the most pressing problem facing our age. As HFE professionals we share this view and believe there is a strong collective will to address what we see as a failure to protect the natural and social environments that support us. While still acknowledging that HFE professionals cannot address these issues alone, we believe we are in a unique position to apply relevant skills and knowledge to assist in addressing the commonly identified problem areas including pollution, climate change, renewable energy, land transformation, and social unrest amongst numerous other emerging global problems. In this panel discussion we present a number of possible contributions from the macroergonomics sub-discipline that we believe well help society find solutions to the current predicament that we find ourselves in.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it