MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3143570923 · doi:10.1109/wsc.2006.322959

Modeling Semiconductor Tools for Small Lotsize Fab Simulations

2006· article· en· W3143570923 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemiconductor device fabricationReduction (mathematics)Key (lock)Task (project management)Computer scienceProcess (computing)Semiconductor device modelingReliability engineeringSemiconductorManufacturing engineeringSemiconductor industryIndustrial engineeringProcess engineeringSystems engineeringEngineeringElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringComputer securityOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Short cycle times are critical to the success of semiconductor manufacturing. The addition of more and more mask layers leads to higher raw process times and makes short cycle times an increasingly challenging task. One cycle time reduction possibility semiconductor manufacturers now look at is lotsize reduction. A reduction in lotsize transfers directly into lower raw process times. Modeling and simulation are key to assess opportunities and risks of such an approach. This paper looks at the implications that follow from small lotsizes for tool models used for the assessment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.295

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207