MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3143643466

Optimal Design of a Multi-Phase Pipeline

2020· dissertation· en· W3143643466 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHuddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Combustion and Slurry Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline transportSizingPipeline (software)SlurryPetroleum engineeringPressure dropEngineeringFlow (mathematics)Nominal Pipe SizeMechanical engineeringProcess engineeringMaterials scienceMechanicsEnvironmental engineeringComposite materialChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A slurry pipeline is one of the transportation modes used for transporting bulk materials for long distance using water or any other type of liquid as a carrier fluid [1-3]. Extensive research has been carried out on the improvement of this type of transportation in addition to the development of alternative ways for transpotation of solid materials. Although the use of fluid flow for transportation purposes has been practiced for more than a millennium, detailed information on the flow behaviour of such complex mixtures in pipelines is still the subject of active research today.<br/><br/>The optimal design of a slurry pipeline includes the selection of the correct pipe sizes, shapes and materials for optimum energy consumption, equipment sizing and reliable operation of the pipeline networks. The prediction of some parameters such as pressure loss, concentration distribution, velocity distribution and wear rate will help the designer to optimise the selection of the design parameters [3-5]. The experimental investigation was carried out to obtain an improved database for modelling the solid-liquid flow in horizontal pipelines. Tests are conducted using uni-sized plastic beads, 4.5 mm diameter and 1329.2 kg/m3 density, as solid particles, and water as a carrier fluid. Frictional head loss is measured as a function of solid concentration and mean velocity. Transparent pipe section is used to study solids’ deposition velocities and solids’ bed. In addition to the experimental results, some other published experimental results are used to develop advanced modelling tools based on an SRC (Saskatchewan Research Council) two-layer model in order to predict and quantify the solid-liquid flow properties horizontally. In order to improve the accuracy of the predicted data, this study includes improvement over the last previous version of Multi-Layer model for predicting flow properties across the cross-section of horizontal pipes transporting a solid-liquid mixture. The proposed model contains empirical correlations, which incorporate a wide range of experimental conditions. The model is applied for the prediction of concentration distribution of solid particles, velocity profile, and pressure drop. The predicted data are compared with the experimental results of different experimental works.<br/><br/>Furthermore, an optimisation model is developed in the current study based on the least cost principle. This model is designed based on the proposed multi-layer model to find the cost of energy for running any slurry system. In addition, the model has been used to find the optimal diameter of horizontal pipelines transporting slurries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it