Compression for Very Sparse Big Social Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Technological advancements in the current era of big data have led to rapid generation and collection of very large amounts of valuable data from a wide variety of rich data sources. As rich data sources, social networks consist of social entities that are linked by some social relationships (e.g., kinship, colleagueship, co-authorship, friendship, followship). Usually, these networks are very big but also very sparse. Embedded in the very sparse but very big networks are implicit, previously unknown and potentially useful information and knowledge that can be discovered by social network analysis and mining. In this paper, we aim to discover interesting social relationships from very sparse but very big social network data. Due to the sparsity of the data, we effectively compress bitmaps representing social entities in the data, from which useful information can be mined and interesting knowledge can be discovered. Evaluation results show the effectiveness of our compression scheme for very sparse but very big social network data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it