MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146746004 · doi:10.1109/iwqos.2011.5931350

Utilizing elevator for wireless sensor data collection in high-rise structure monitoring

2011· article· en· W3146746004 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElevator Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElevatorBase stationExploitWireless sensor networkComputer scienceNetwork packetStairsData collectionComputer networkScheduling (production processes)Real-time computingWirelessTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently wireless sensor networks have been widely suggested for Structural Health Monitoring. In such applications, diverse sensor nodes are deployed in a building structure, collecting ambient data such as temperature and strain from various locations and reporting them to a central base station for processing and diagnosing. For today's high-rise structures (e.g., the Guangzhou New TV Tower, a project that we have participated in, peaks at 600m above ground), the extensive vertical dimension creates enormous challenges toward sensor data collection, beyond those addressed in state-of-the-art motelike systems. For example, with a straightforward base station placement, a huge amount of data will accumulate as being relayed to the base station. As such, the sensor nodes close to the base station would quickly run out of energy for relaying the traffic. The accumulated traffic would also saturate the wireless medium, introducing significant interferences and collisions. The extensive height of these building structures, however, make elevators an indispensable component. This motivates us to develop EleSense, a novel high-rise structure monitoring framework that explores using elevators. In EleSense, an elevator is attached with the base station and collects data when it moves across different floors to serve passengers, which can effectively reduce the traffic accumulation and the collection delay. To maximally exploit the benefit, we take a unique angle with the cross-layer design. We present an abstraction of the high-rise structure monitoring problem that exploits elevators, and model it as a joint optimization across link scheduling, packet routing and end-to-end delivery. We propose a centralized algorithm to solve it optimally. We further propose a distributed implementation to accommodate the hardware capability of a sensor node and address other practical issues. We evaluate EleSense through ns-2 simulations and with real configurations from the Guangzhou New TV Tower. The results show that EleSense has a throughput gain of 30.4% to 200.6% over the case without elevators. We also observe a gain of 40.5% to 127.5% over a straightforward 802.11 MAC scheme without the cross-layer optimization. Moreover, EleSense can significantly reduce the communication costs while maintaining excellent fairness with reliable data delivering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.627
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElevator Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207