Abnormal Behavior Recognition in Classroom Pose Estimation of College Students Based on Spatiotemporal Representation Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artificial intelligence and fifth generation (5G) technology are widely adopted to evaluate the classroom poses of college students, with the help of campus video surveillance equipment. To ensure the effective learning in class, it is important to detect and intervene in abnormal behaviors like sleeping and using cellphones in time. Based on spatiotemporal representation learning, this paper presents a deep learning algorithm to evaluate classroom poses of college students. Firstly, feature engineering was adopted to mine the moving trajectories of college students, which were used to determine student distribution and establish a classroom prewarning system. Then, k-means clustering (KMC) was employed for cluster analysis on different student groups, and identify the features of each group. For a specific student group, the classroom surveillance video was decomposed into several frames; the edge of each frame was extracted by edge detection algorithm, and imported to the proposed convolutional neural network (CNN). Experimental results show that our algorithm is 5% more accurate than the benchmark three-dimensional CNN (C3D), making it an effective tool to recognize abnormal behaviors of college students in class.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".