Fast collision avoidance for manipulator arms: a sequential search strategy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A sequential strategy is presented for planning collision-free motions for a manipulator arm. The basic idea behind the approach is to plan the motion of each link successively, starting from the base link. Suppose that the motion of links to link i (including link i) has been planned. This already determines the path of one end (the proximal end) of link i+1. The motion of link i+1 is now planned along this path by controlling the degree of freedom associated with it, which is a 2-D motion planning problem. This strategy results in one 1-D (the first link is degenerate) and (n-1) 2-D planning problems. The 2-D motion planning problem is to plan the motion of a single link as one end of this link moves along a fixed path. This problem is posed in t* theta space, where t is the parameter along the path and theta the angle to be planned. The obstacles in t* theta space are approximated by discretizing t. Fast and efficient techniques are then used to plan a path in t* theta space. Thus, the strategy leads to fast and efficient algorithms and is especially suited for highly redundant arms.>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".