MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146897955 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2021.3070035

Fault Detection of Pneumatic Control Valves Based on Canonical Variate Analysis

2021· article· en· W3146897955 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFault detection and isolationBenchmark (surveying)Sliding window protocolMahalanobis distanceComputer scienceRandom variateStatisticData miningAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsWindow (computing)Random variableActuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the fault detection of a pneumatic control valve using canonical variate analysis (CVA). CVA can find the optimal linear combinations of p-window and f-window data, so that the correlation between these combinations can be maximized. Based on CVA, the p-window data is considered by traditional hotelling T <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> statistic and squared prediction error (SPE) indicators, the corresponding fault detection rates (FDR) are low. In order to improve the FDR, a detection indicator based on SMD (square of the Mahalanobis distance) of the residual is proposed in this paper. The proposed indicator considers not only the information in the p-window data, but also that of the f-window data, which can improve the FDRs. The proposed techniques have been validated using a Development and Application of Methods for Actuator Diagnosis in Industrial Control Systems (DAMADICS) benchmark. It concludes that 14 out of the 19 faults can be successfully detected using the proposed method (CVA-SMD). Simulation results have shown that the CVA-SMD can improve the FDR compared with existing CVA-T <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> and CVA-SPE methods. Experiments based on real-world data have also demonstrated that the CVA-SMD has better performance than existing PCA-T <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> , PCA-SPE, PCA-SMD, CVA-T <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> and CVA-SPE methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it