Mapping in unstructured natural environment: a sensor fusion framework for wearable sensor suites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present a generalized mapping framework that can withstand the challenges incurred by working in unstructured outdoor environments, such as a snowy forest. The proposed method takes advantage of a sensor fusion scheme, where sensors such as cameras and lidars are used in order to reconstruct the surrounding natural environment. Although mapping techniques such as SLAM and ICP cannot themselves properly handle the complexity of natural scenes, they do have the potential to contribute to the global solution in a proposed sensor fusion scheme, based on a factor graph architecture. In this paper, we propose an innovative map registration scheme for visual maps, and show how it can improve the reconstruction quality after data fusion. We also analyze the behavior and sensitivity of factor graphs to uncertainties, by comparing the residual error with different parameter combinations such as variances, using an exhaustive grid search with ground truth comparison. Finally, we suggest an ICP-inferred loop closure, capable of compensating position and attitude drift. The experiments are carried out by recording in a snowy forest using a wearable sensor suite. In the experiments, ground truth was acquired using a millimeter-accurate total station. The proposed framework is shown to be robust and likewise capable of providing estimates that are otherwise unattainable using classic techniques, such as visual SLAM and ICP for lasers. Finally, a visible improvement in the map reconstruction quality is shown, and the proposed framework achieves a translation error of 0.36 m.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".