A Lightweight Concept Drift Detection and Adaptation Framework for IoT Data Streams
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, with the increasing popularity of “Smart Technology”, the number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and systems have surged significantly. Various IoT services and functionalities are based on the analytics of IoT streaming data. However, IoT data analytics faces concept drift challenges due to the dynamic nature of IoT systems and the ever-changing patterns of IoT data streams. In this article, we propose an adaptive IoT streaming data analytics framework for anomaly detection use cases based on optimized LightGBM and concept drift adaptation. A novel drift adaptation method named Optimized Adaptive and Sliding Windowing (OASW) is proposed to adapt to the pattern changes of online IoT data streams. Experiments on two public datasets show the high accuracy and efficiency of our proposed adaptive LightGBM model compared against other state-of-the-art approaches. The proposed adaptive LightGBM model can perform continuous learning and drift adaptation on IoT data streams without human intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it