MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154646929 · doi:10.1201/9780429168703-83

Sugars: Soft Caramel and Sucre à la Crème – an Undergraduate Experiment about Sugar Crystallization

2021· book-chapter· en· W3154646929 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFreezing and Crystallization Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSugarCrystallizationFood scienceChemistryPolymer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Candy-making entails finely controlling the phase transitions of aqueous solutions of sugar. Both kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of sugar crystallization are indeed at play in the art of confectionery. This chapter illustrates the undergraduate-level concepts by preparing and contrasting soft caramel and sucre a la creme recipes that, remarkably, differ only in their tempering. It provides some background on these two candies and detail the physical chemistry involved in controlling their sucrose composition and microstructure. While soft caramel is a fairly generic candy, sucre a la creme is associated with a geographically specific region. Its precise origin remains uncertain, but its deep connection with the French Canadian experience is undebatable: one of its key ingredients, maple sugar, is indeed indigenous to the north east of the American continent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFreezing and Crystallization ProcessesFrench-language works237,207