A Multiobjective Approach for Sector Duration Optimization in Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment Planning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sector duration optimization (SDO) is a problem arising in treatment planning for stereotactic radiosurgery on Gamma Knife. Given a set of isocenter locations, SDO aims to select collimator size configurations and irradiation times thereof such that target tissues receive prescribed doses in a reasonable amount of treatment time and healthy tissues nearby are spared. We present a multiobjective linear programming model for SDO to generate a diverse collection of solutions so that clinicians can select the most appropriate treatment. We develop a generic two-phase solution strategy based on the ε-constraint method for solving multiobjective optimization models, 2phasε, which aims to systematically increase the number of high-quality solutions obtained, instead of conducting a traditional uniform search. To improve solution quality further and to accelerate the procedure, we incorporate some general and problem-specific enhancements. Moreover, we propose an alternative version of 2phasε, which makes use of machine learning tools to reduce the computational effort. In our computational study on eight previously treated real test cases, a significant portion of 2phasε solutions outperformed clinical results and those from a single-objective model from the literature. In addition to significant benefits of the algorithmic enhancements, our experiments illustrate the usefulness of machine learning strategies to reduce the overall run times nearly by half while maintaining or besting the clinical practice. History: Accepted by Paul Brooks, Area Editor for Applications in Biology, Medicine, and Healthcare. Funding: This work was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [Discovery Grant RGPIN-2019-05588]. Supplemental Material: The software that supports the findings of this study is available within the paper and its Supplementary Information [ https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/suppl/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1252 ] or is available from the IJOC GitHub software repository ( https://github.com/INFORMSJoC ) at [ http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7048848 ].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".