MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3157985989 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3076925

Optimizing Information Freshness in MEC-Assisted Status Update Systems With Heterogeneous Energy Harvesting Devices

2021· article· en· W3157985989 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaShenzhen Research Institute of Big DataNatural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
KeywordsComputer scienceRandomnessEnergy harvestingScheduling (production processes)Edge computingDistributed computingReal-time computingEdge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEnergy (signal processing)Mathematical optimizationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ever-growing number of Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices makes multiaccess edge computing (MEC)-assisted status update system more and more attractive, which can be deployed to enable remote data acquisition and analysis from urban space. The ambient computing resource at edge automatically extracts valuable status update information from the data collected by IoT devices, which supports the real-time remote monitoring applications. In this article, we employ the concept of Age of Information (AoI) to quantify the freshness of status updates. To combat the limited battery capacity at IoT devices, energy harvesting (EH) is leveraged to capture the green energy from ambient environment. Specifically, we investigate an age minimization problem by considering the randomness in energy arrivals, heterogeneity in harvesting mode, and the stochasticity in transmission and computing process. The formulated problem is a long-term stochastic optimization problem. Then, we transform the original problem into a series of per-time slot deterministic optimization problem. An online scheduling policy is proposed to obtain the energy management decisions at devices, and the transmission and computing scheduling decisions among multiple devices without any prior knowledge on the network dynamics, which is facilitated to be implemented. Simulation results show that the performance of our proposed algorithm is competitive when compared with other existing schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.009
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it