Design and Control of a Novel Coaxial Tilt-Rotor UAV
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the design and control of a new coaxial tilt-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (CTRUAV) are presented. The CTRUAV is an electric-powered unmanned aerial vehicle with a special configuration, which is composed of two pairs of tiltable coaxial rotors and a rear rotor. A CTRUAV prototype has been designed by 3-D computer-aided design software and constructed according to the designing scheme. The dynamic model of a CTRUAV is derived by utilizing the Euler–Lagrange equation, which considers the special features of the coaxial rotors and air drag forces on the CTRUAV. An adaptive controller is developed to realize motion control for the CTRUAV. The adaptive controller includes two subcontrollers: an inner-loop attitude controller and an outer-loop velocity controller. The stability of the resulting closed-loop CTRUAV system is analyzed via the Lyapunov method. Finally, several simulations and real experimental tests are implemented to validate the effectiveness of the developed CTRUAV system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it