MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158107828 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3075540

Verifiable and Secure SVM Classification for Cloud-Based Health Monitoring Services

2021· article· en· W3158107828 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Waterloo
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsVerifiable secret sharingCloud computingMathematical proofComputer scienceNotationConfidentialityAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceComputer securityMathematicsArithmeticProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cloud-based health monitoring services, support vector machine (SVM) classification techniques are often utilized by medical institutes to build medical decision models, which can be outsourced to a cloud server for producing medical decisions based on medical features from remote clients. In this article, we propose a verifiable and secure SVM classification scheme ( <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathsf {VSSVMC}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> ) for cloud-based health monitoring services in a malicious setting, where the cloud server may return invalid decisions. By constructing verifiable indices, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathsf {VSSVMC}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> ensures the verifiability of medical decisions, which enables clients to detect whether the cloud server returns incorrect or incomplete medical decisions. Symmetric key encryption is leveraged to ensure the confidentiality of the medical decision model and medical data with computational efficiency. We give security and verifiability definitions and provide formal security and verifiability proofs for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathsf {VSSVMC}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> . Performance analyses show that <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathsf {VSSVMC}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> is extremely efficient in terms of computation, communication, and storage. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathsf {VSSVMC}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> achieves microsecond-level execution time with kilobyte-level communication and storage overheads on the tested data set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it