Joint Access Point Assignment and Power Allocation in Multi-Tier Hybrid RF/VLC HetNets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the joint problem of access point (AP) assignment and power allocation (PA) in a three-tier hybrid radio frequency/visible light communication (VLC) heterogeneous network (HetNet). The main goal is to maximize the HetNet’s sum-rate under practical constraints such as APs’ power budgets and users’ quality-of-service (QoS) requirements, while maintaining an acceptable level of illumination in the VLC system. When this design problem is formulated mathematically, it turns out to be a combinatorial decision problem that involves non-linear constraints, and hence is NP hard. To efficiently obtain good quality solutions for the formulated problem, a reformulation into thecollege admission modelis first performed. Then, a distributed and low-complexity algorithm based on matching theory and an efficient heuristic PA scheme are proposed to obtain a good quality suboptimal solution for the joint problem. Simulation results highlight the robustness of the proposed solution and its significant gain in network sum-rate as compared to different benchmark schemes. The effect of various system parameters such as the minimum QoS and maximum illumination requirements on the performance of the proposed solution is studied. Finally, the theoretical analysis of convergence, stability, and complexity of the proposed technique is performed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".