MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3158553320 · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107433

Video salient object detection using dual-stream spatiotemporal attention

2021· article· en· W3158553320 on OpenAlexaff
Chenchu Xu, Zhifan Gao, Heye Zhang, Shuo Li, Victor Hugo C. de Albuquerque

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Soft Computing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVisual Attention and Saliency Detection
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersSpecial Project for Research and Development in Key areas of Guangdong ProvinceFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsComputer scienceDual (grammatical number)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionSalientObject (grammar)Object detectionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video salient object detection plays an important role in many exciting applications in different areas. However, the existing deep learning-based video salient object detection methods still struggle in scenes of large salient object variabilities and great background scene diversity between and within frames. In this paper, we propose a dual-stream spatiotemporal attention network (DSSANet) for saliency detection in videos. It creatively introduces a multiplex attention mechanism to effectively extract and fuse spatiotemporal features of video salient object over frames in the video, thereby improving saliency detection performance. The DSSANet consists of: (1) A context feature path leverages a novel attention-augmented convolutional LSTM to effectively model the long-range dependency of the great temporal variation in the salient object over frames. (2) A content feature path creatively leverages an attention-based 1D dilated convolution to effectively model the local pixel correlation structure of each pixel in the salient object and the surrounding objects. (3) A refinement fusion module fuses these two features from their paths and further refines the fused feature by an attention-based feature selection. By integrating these three parts, DSSANet accurately detects the salient object from the video. The extensive experiments are performed on four public datasets and demonstrate the effectiveness of DSSANet and the superiority to five state-of-the-art video salient object detection methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Soft ComputingSame topicVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionFrench-language works237,207