MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

RISC-V Barrel Processor for Deep Neural Network Acceleration

2021· article· en· W3158928873 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalIBM (Canada)Polytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceThread (computing)Reduced instruction set computingInstruction setNetwork processorEmbedded systemPipeline (software)Parallel computingComputer hardwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a barrel RISC-V processor designed to control a deep neural network accelerator. Our design has a 5-stage pipeline data path with 8 hardware threads (harts). Each thread is executed under a strict round robin scheduler and is responsible for providing data and control signals to a neural network processing element (PE). Each PE is capable of arbitrary precision GEneral Matrix Vector (GEMV) operations. The execution of each thread is independent of other threads and any communication between threads are sent through shared memory via software. To reduce the area required for implementation, our processor is an implementation of the RV32I plus a set of custom CSRs for controlling the PEs. Our design passes all riscv_test written in assembly and compiled with RISC-V gcc. Our 8-hart barrel processor runs at 250 MHz with CPI of 1 and consumes 0.372W. To demonstrate the capabilities of our design, we computed a GEMV operation with an input matrix size of 8 by 128 and a weight matrix size of 128 by 128 with two-bit precision in only 16 clock cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207