MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Propostas de Atividades com Tabelas em Livros Didáticos de Matemática dos Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental do Brasil e do Quebec

2021· article· pt· W3159145503 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJornal Internacional de Estudos em Educação Matemática · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistics Education and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ResumoO livro didático é uma das principais fontes de consulta dos professores no ensino de estatística. Esse artigo analisa atividades envolvendo tabelas apresentadas nos livros didáticos de Matemática, dos anos iniciais do Ensino Fundamental do Brasil e do Quebec/CA. Nossas análises se fundamentaram em seis categorias: tipo de representação (quadro, banco de dados ou tabela); função da tabela; habilidade explorada; tipo de tabela (simples ou dupla entrada); tipo de variável; representação dos elementos fundamentais da tabela. Os resultados revelam que, em todos os anos de escolarização, podemos encontrar os três tipos de representação, sendo a maior frequência de tabelas em ambos os lugares de publicação. Além disso, a maioria delas é utilizada como objeto de estudo, indicando uma mudança recente de foco nos livros brasileiros, que priorizavam atividades na quais as tabelas eram pretexto para outros conceitos serem abordados. Observamos, entretanto, uma ênfase em interpretar e completar tabelas já estruturadas. Infelizmente, muitas tabelas não apresentam a fonte, principalmente nos livros do Quebec. A ausência de contextos reais e significativos não contribui efetivamente para a aprendizagem Estatística pelos alunos.
 Palavras-chave: Livros Didáticos. Ensino de Estatística. Tabelas. Anos Iniciais
 AbstractTextbooks are one of the main sources of consultation for teaching statistics. This article analyzes activities involving tables presented in Primary School Mathematics textbooks from Brazil and from Quebec - CA. Our analysis were based on six categories: type of representation (rectangular configuration, database or table); table function; explored skill; table type (single or double entry); type of variable; representation of the fundamental elements of the table. The results show that in all years of schooling we can find the three types of representation, with the highest frequency of tables in both places of publication. Most of them are used as an object of study, indicating a recent change of focus in Brazilian books that prioritized activities in which tables were a pretext for other concepts to be addressed. However, we still observe an emphasis on interpreting and completing tables already structured. Unfortunately, many tables do not present their source, especially in Quebec textbooks. The absence of real data and significant contexts effectively does not contribute to the students' significant learning of Statistics.
 Keyword: Textbook. Teaching of Statistics. Tables. Primary School

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it