MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3159581987 · doi:10.1002/mmce.22739

Enhancing <scp>5G</scp> antenna performance by using <scp>3D FSS</scp> structures

2021· article· en· W3159581987 on OpenAlexaff
Ferial Guidoum, Mohamed Lamine Tounsi, Tan‐Phu Vuong, Noureddine Ababou, M.C.E. Yagoub

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna (radio)Radiation patternRadiation propertiesSide lobePatch antennaMaterials scienceRadiationOpticsAcousticsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, an enhanced 3D frequency selective surface (FSS) patch antenna is proposed for 5G applications. A 23 to 26 GHz patch antenna was first designed before improving its performance by adding a 3 × 5 unit cell two-layer 2D transmission FSS structure. Then, reflective walls were placed on the side edges of the obtained structure in order to focus the incident field towards the main lobe; the aim being to build a 3D FSS structure without requiring the 3D printing technique. The total size of the obtained antenna is of 40 × 40 × 14 mm3. A comparative study was carried out between the performances of the patch antenna, the 2D FSS antenna and the 3D FSS antenna. A good agreement was observed between simulated results and measurements. An improvement of almost 3 and 2 dBi was obtained compared to the 2D FSS case, respectively, in simulated and measured results, while the side lobes in radiation patterns were decreased by more than 4 dBi, which confirms the adequate proposed design in switching to 3D structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207