Thermal activation characteristics and thermoluminescence of chert from the Red Wing, Ontario region, and its putative heat treatment in prehistory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the still-outstanding questions in New World archaeology is whether pre- historic toolmakers here heat-treated chert raw material prior to the manufacture of stone tools, as had been demonstrated for a number of cultural loci in the Old World. This question is of particular relevance to our understanding of the technological behaviour of the Early Paleoindian people of the Parkhill complex, which has been dated between 10,400 and 11,300 14 C years ago. To address it, we studied chert samples from in situ geological contexts, from reworked contexts such as glacier-plucked surface scatters or creek gravels, and from a nearby archaeological context. The samples from archaeological contexts have been flaked in antiq- uity, subsequently buried, and recovered during an archaeological excavation. We compared the thermoluminescence (TL) properties of these unknowns with those of ex- perimentally annealed cherts. The control samples, collected and flaked from the lowest of four chert layers at the Fossil Hill Formation outcrop, were annealed for four hours at 300∞C, 400∞C, and 600∞C. Our investigation focused on the TL sensitivity of the 100∞C TL peak, which is not present in natural TL but is easily observed by prompt TL following beta or gamma dose irradiation. This peak undergoes a greater sensitivity change than the high-temperature TL following heat treatment, therefore it may be considered a far more sensitive paleothermometer. The thermal activation characteristic (TAC) of the cherts was also exam- ined. In addition, we studied the natural TL and dose response of the high-temperature TL of the cherts, and their response to illumination by natural light. On the basis of these investigations we conclude that prior heat treatment is readily detect- able in Red Wing chert, however that it has not taken place in the archaeological material we examined. This conclusion is confirmed by the excessive apparent ages of the archaeo- logical cherts, which are an order of magnitude higher than any reasonable archaeological estimates for the presence of humans in the New World. Chert self dose rates were based on ICPMS-determined U and Th radioisotope chain concentrations, and XRF-determined K concentrations. In addition, we found that the high-temperature TL signal in chert is sensitive to reduction by exposure to natural light. This may possibly yield a spuriously lower TL signal in surface- collected archaeological material than in self-same geological samples collected recently, and may thus lead to an erroneous conclusion of past heat treatment. A correct procedure for the accurate detection of chert heat treatment in antiquity is proposed. K K K Key words PALEOINDIAN, HEAT TREATMENT, CHERT, FLINT, PARKHILL COM- PLEX, THERMAL ACTI- VATION, CHERT AN- NEALING, CHERT BLEACHING, THER- MOLUMINESCENCE,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".