MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3160450649 · doi:10.1109/tap.2022.3142294

IE-GSTC Metasurface Field Solver Using Surface Susceptibility Tensors With Normal Polarizabilities

2022· article· en· W3160450649 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolverClassification of discontinuitiesSurface (topology)Field (mathematics)Tensor (intrinsic definition)PhysicsRepresentation (politics)Mathematical analysisElectromagnetic fieldGeometryMathematicsPure mathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An integral equation (IE)-based electromagnetic field solver using metasurface susceptibility tensors is proposed and validated using a variety of numerical examples in 2-D. The proposed method solves for fields generated by the metasurface, which is represented as spatial discontinuities satisfying the generalized sheet transition conditions (GSTCs), and described using tensorial surface susceptibility densities, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\bar {\bar {\chi }}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> . For the first time, the complete tensorial representation of susceptibilities is incorporated in this integrated IE-GSTC framework, where the normal surface polarizabilities and their spatial derivatives along the metasurface are rigorously taken into account. The proposed field equation formulation further utilizes a local coordinate system, which enables modeling metasurfaces with arbitrary orientations and geometries. The proposed 2-D boundary element method BEM-GSTC framework is successfully tested using a variety of examples, including infinite and finite-sized metasurfaces, periodic metasurfaces, and complex shaped structures, showing comparisons with both analytical results and a commercial full-wave solver. It is shown that the zero-thickness sheet model with complete tensorial susceptibilities can very accurately reproduce the macroscopic fields, accounting for their angular field scattering response and the edge diffraction effects in finite-sized surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it