MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase Transitions for One-Vs-One and One-Vs-All Linear Separability in Multiclass Gaussian Mixtures

2021· article· en· W3160954170 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaussianBinary numberFocus (optics)MathematicsSeparable spaceFunction (biology)Binary dataMixture modelApplied mathematicsAlgorithmStatisticsMathematical analysisPhysicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study a fundamental statistical question in multiclass classification: When are data linearly separable? Unlike binary classification, linear separability in multiclass settings can be defined in different ways. Here, we focus on the so called one-vs-one (OvO) and one-vs-all (OvA) linear separability. We consider data generated from a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) in a linear asymptotic high-dimensional regime. In this setting, we prove that both the OvO and OvA separability undergo a sharp phase-transition as a function of the overparameterization ratio. We present precise formulae characterizing the phase transitions as a function of the data geometry and the number of classes. Existing results on binary classification follow as special cases of our new formulae. Numerical simulations verify the validity of the asymptotic predictions in finite dimensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207