Secure and Resilient Artificial Intelligence of Things: A HoneyNet Approach for Threat Detection and Situational Awareness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) is emerging as the future of Industry 4.0 and will be widely applied in consumer, commercial, and industrial fields. In AIoT, intelligent objects (smart devices), smart gateways, and edge/cloud nodes are subject to a large number of security threats and attacks. However, the traditional network security approaches are not fully suitable for AIoT. To address this issue, this article proposes a HoneyNet approach that includes both threat detection and situational awareness to enhance the security and resilience of AIoT. We first design a HoneyNet based on Docker technology that collects data to detect adversaries and monitor their attack behaviors. The collected data are then converted into images and used as samples to train a deep learning model. Finally, the trained model is deployed in AIoT to perform threat detection and provide situational awareness. To validate our scheme, we conduct HoneyNet deployment and model training on the SiteWhere AIoT platform and construct a simulation environment on this platform for threat detection and situational awareness. The experimental results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it