A Generalized Framework for Preserving Both Privacy and Utility in Data Outsourcing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Property preserving encryption techniques have significantly advanced the utility of encrypted data in data outsourcing. However, while preserving certain properties (e.g., the prefixes or order of the data) in the encrypted data, such encryption schemes are typically limited to specific data types (e.g., IP addresses) or applications (e.g., range queries over order-preserved data), and highly vulnerable to the emerging inference attacks which may greatly limit their applications in practice. In this paper, to the best of our knowledge, we make the first attempt to generalize the prefix-preserving encryption to make it applicable to more general data types (e.g., geo-locations, market basket data, DNA sequences, numerical data and timestamps) and secure against the inference attacks. Furthermore, we present a generalized multi-view outsourcing framework that generates multiple indistinguishable data views in which one view fully preserves the utility for data analysis, and its accurate analysis result can be obliviously retrieved. We empirically evaluate the performance of our outsourcing framework against two common inference attacks on two different real datasets: the check-in location dataset and network traffic dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed framework preserves both privacy (with bounded leakage and indistinguishable data views) and utility (with 100% analysis accuracy).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".