TRACKING CONTROL AND STABILIZATION OF A FRACTIONAL FINANCIAL RISK SYSTEM USING NOVEL ACTIVE FINITE-TIME FAULT-TOLERANT CONTROLS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a fractional-order financial risk system for the first time. Employing well-known tools and analyses such as bifurcations diagrams and spectral entropy, the dynamical behaviors of the system associated with fractional derivative are investigated. The impacts of the fractional derivative on the system’s behavior and its dynamical feature are shown. Then, tracking control and stabilization of the systems are studied. As it is obvious, the existence of faults and failures in the process of control of financial and economic systems is undeniable — this issue necessitates applying proper control techniques for the systems. So as to achieve appropriate results in the control of fractional financial risk system, two finite-time fault-tolerant controllers are proposed, namely, finite-time active fault-tolerant control and finite-time passive fault-tolerant control. Not only do these techniques force the system to reach desired values in finite time, but also, the proposed techniques are robust against uncertainties, faults, and failures in actuators. Through finite-time observers, the effects of all uncertainties are taken to account in the active controller. Finally, numerical simulations of tracking control and stabilization are presented. For numerical simulations, the fractional financial risk system is considered to be in the presence of unknown disturbance as well as faults and failures in actuators. It is assumed that the system is in the presence of various types of actuator faults. Numerical results affirm the ability of the offered control techniques for pushing the states of the fractional-order risk system to the desired value in a short period of time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".