Efficient Privacy-Preserving Similarity Range Query With Quadsector Tree in eHealthcare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a consequence of advance in the Internet of Things (IoT) and big data technology, smart eHealthcare has emerged and greatly enabled patients to enjoy high-quality healthcare services in disease prediction, clinical decision making and healthcare surveillance. Meanwhile, in order to support the dramatic increase of healthcare data, healthcare centers often outsource the on-premises data to a powerful cloud and deploy the cloud server to manage the data. However, since the healthcare data usually contain some sensitive information and also the cloud server is not fully trusted, healthcare centers need to encrypt the data before outsourcing them to the cloud. Unfortunately, data encryption inevitably hinders some advanced applications of the data like the similarity range query in cloud. Although many studies on similarity range query over encrypted data have been reported, most of them still have some limitations in security, efficiency and practicality. Aiming at this challenge, in this article, we propose a new efficient privacy-preserving similarity range query (EPSim) scheme. Specifically, we first present a modified asymmetric scalar-product-preserving encryption (ASPE) scheme and prove it is selectively secure. Then, we introduce a Quadsector tree to represent the data, and employ a filtration condition to design an efficient algorithm for efficient similarity range queries over the Quadsector tree. Finally, we propose our EPSim scheme by integrating the modified ASPE scheme and Quadsector tree. Detailed security analysis indicates that our proposed EPSim scheme is really secure. In addition, extensive performance evaluations are conducted, and the results also demonstrate it is efficient and practical.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".